The Special Appeal No. 867 of 2022 was dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear before the court despite filing an application and affidavit of service.
Special Appeal No. 867 of 2022 dismissed for non-prosecution; file consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order Sheet (Continuation)
| CaseNo.SA | /467/2O22 M/sSAPFCO&Ors.-vs-IDFCFirst |
Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Dateof Order qder-Ue.Qs t"271O3t2023 llellNa.!l BC |
Orderwithsignature Present: ForApplicant :None ForRespondent:Ld.AdvocateMs.TutulDasSingh alongwith Mr.R.l4okhedee. |
Office action withdate anddated Signatureof |
| Ld.Counselfortheapplicanthasfiled apetitionbeing I.A.No.328of 2023andI.A.No.329ot2023onbehalfof the SARFAESIapplicationinviewof the finalsettlementbythe Bank.Ld.CounselFortheapplicanthasfiledaffidavitof service.Buttheapplicantisnotpresenttomovethe application. HencetheS.ANo.867of2022isdismissedfornon prosecution. File beconsignedtotherecord room. |
||
| (nmuu;auoFin-oii) PresidingOfficer-in-charge DRT.III,KOIKATA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal No. 867 of 2022 can be decided in the absence of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s SAPFCO & Ors.
IDFC First Bank
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
