State Bank of India v. Ravi Ranjan Tiwari
Case brief
What is this about?
Order allowing a miscellaneous application to withdraw a recovery certificate due to compromise.
What did the court decide?
Allow M.A.; RC no.146 of 2017 dismissed as withdrawn; original documents returned.
What the court decided
Office action taken with data
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| MA 20 of2023 | |
| 24.03.2023 | This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by applicant seeking permission to withdraw the RC no. 146 of2017 in OA no.482 of2016. It is stated therein that the matter has been compromised and the said amount has been received by the applicant bank. This application is supported by an affidavit of Shri Shashi Ranjan Chaudhary Sio Krishna Dev Choudhary, Chief Manager, SBI, SARB Patna which substantiates the contents of the application. Under the circumstances, the MA stands allowed and RC no.146 of 2017 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Original documents, if any lying with the Tribunal be returned to the applicant bank as per rule. Consigned the record. A Copy of order be sent to the parties and Ld. Recovery Officer for necessary action. |
| Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. Patna (KaUShal~adaV) Presiding Officer |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant Bank
Coram
KaUShal~adaV
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court