DRT-1 Mumbai declared an Consumer Complaint (Retd. SA 74 of 2022) withdrawn by the applicant citing a settlement with the respondent bank and closed the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 21/03/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 74 of 2022 Suresh Ramchandra Vankani Vs State Bank of India |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Ms. Salma Ghaswala I/b Ghaswala & Associates appeared for the applicant. Advocate Mr. Mihir Modi I/b PSL Advocates & Solicitors Mr. Rahul Vankvani appeared for the respondent no.3. 1. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that settlement has been arrived between the Applicant and Respondent Bank therefore she seeks withdrawal of the present SA as account has already been settled between the parties. 2. In view of the submission made by the Ld. Counsel for the Applicant, the present SA is hereby disposed off as withdrawn. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I |
Sgj/-2
Suresh Ramchandra Vankani
State Bank of India
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
