Dismissed
Smt Bharti Hadav v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.
DRTSA/697/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER RETIARK |
|---|---|
| sA697122 2310s123 |
,! Onthe otherhandResPondentCounselbY objectingthePraYet'aPprisedthe llenchthat theResPondenthasalreadywithdrawnearlier demandnoticeas well aspossession notice dated26107122bYissuing freshdemand notlc and alsoPossessionnotice datcd11104123. 4.Onbeing askedwhetherintimationt withdrawearlieractionhas beengiventoth ApplicantsideornotResPondent Counse sr-rbmitsthatthoLrghnointimatiorr hasbee giventotheAPPlicantsseParatelY howeve throughcontentton sbeforethisBenohnow th Applicantsarebeing informedthatearli lssulngdemandnoticedate ShriH.S.Verma,Adv fbrtheApplioanls "Sfrti-putr.,AhmedQuazi'Advfbrthe Respondent LMatteristakenLrpforhearingon applicationforurgent hearingandalsoIA ti,Liio'i/z:dated tstosl23applicationfor grantofstaY. 2.Onmatter beingtakenatthe\ery'.outset Appricantg::I.l%,1:J"'::,:;'"1;;";.,,')<br>earlierPossesslon ,"iui.aioPlotNo'46NewDewasRoad i';;rprmsubmitsthat withoutrvithdrawing ;;;ii.;possessionnoticeandinspiteoforder drated'l3l}9l22passedbythisTribunal Respondenthasissued subsequentpossesston ;;,i;.datedl7lO4l23andpravsfurlherstay ."""i4i"*furtheractionofthe Respondent in prirruunt tonotice datedlTl04l23' SD actioninitiated t- |
GONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| OBIO3l22followingthepossessionnotice dated26I07122 hasalreadybeenwithdrawn' 5.OninformationsuppliedtheRespondent Counsel,ApplicantCounselsubmitsthatnow hedesirestowithdrawthis SAand alsoprays libertytofileafreshregardingsubsequent posseisionnoticeaswellasdemandnotice' 6.AtthispointoftimeRespondcnt Counsel apprisedthatafterwithdrawingearlierdemand noil."dated08/03122afresh demandnotice dated13112122hasbeenissuedfollowedby possessionnoticedated1710423' 7.Lookingtothecontentionsofboththe sidesinceitp".submissionofRespondent Counselearlieidemandnotice dated08103122 andpossessionnoticedated26107122has already beenwithdrawntherefore thereisno needlefttoprosecutethis SA further' |
||
| Presiding Ol-ticer D.R.1',JabalPur (M.P&c.G) 8.ThereforeasprayedbytheApplicant Counsel,thisSAisbeingdisposedofas withdrawnwithlibertytofileafreshwithin prescribedtimelimitasPerlaw' g.Record!ss6nsionedrr''therecordrcgn' SD/-- (RamNtwas I'atel) |
Ram Narwal
D.R. Jalalpur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court