Disposed
Ms Om Enterprieses v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/467/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Special Appeal No. 467 of 2023 allowed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh appeal.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE sA467 t23 2510st23 |
Ms.SnehMishra,AdvfortheApplicants Shri Adamya Bajpai,AdvfbrrhcI{espondenr DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER |
RE]yIARK |
|---|---|---|
| uplbrhearingon lANo.2204123dated fault s0tTlc tothc l.Matter application 22t05t23. IS for taken stay 2.OnmatterbeingtakenItespondent CoLrnselapprisedtheBench andtoApplicant Corrnselthat theauctionscheduledfortoday r.lotgoingtobeconcludcd sirrceauction proceedingcouldnotbeLrploadeduncjcrthc rvchsite. .RespondentCounselfur-thcrsLrbntits that incctheRespondcnt-Bankhasalreadv ithdrawnthe auctiondated25105123dueto echnicalfaultnow thereisnoneedtohear on hisapplicationforstay andfirftlrersubmits hatthis SAhasalso becomcinliLrstoLrssincc o otherrelielis claimed undcr thcSAexpect ochallengingthesalcnotice datedl7lo5l23 bllowingtlreauctiondated25105123. Inreply'ApplicantCounscl subnritsthat houghasperinlbrmationol'thcRespondent icleauctionscheduledfortodalhasalreadv ccnwithdrarvnduc.totechnical o\ r'vertheApplicirntshaver.aised l.hcrpointswhichare alsor.cllted cspondent-Bank. ApplicantCounsell'urthersLrbmitsthat cspondent-Bankma1,bedircctcd toconsider I 'sD |
¶5
GONTD. ORDER-SHEET
¶6
PAGE No
¶7
CASE No
¶8
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | RE]UIARK |
|---|---|---|
| settlementletteroftheApplicantssincethe Applicantsarervilliugtopa)'llreoulstanding. 6.ApplicantCounselprayslibertytofilc afreshSAtochallengcactiono[I{espondent- []ankifoccasiotturiscs. 7.ApplicantCuLtttsclprayslbrtvithdrar.val olthisSAwithlibc'rt1. 8.Lookingtocontclltionsol'lroththcsidc speoiallysubnrissionol'thcRespor-rdent Counselthatinpursuanttoatrctiontiotice dated17105123Ann.A-4auotionscheduled today hasalrcady bcenrvithdrau'nb1'the Respondent-Banksinceattctionprocesscould not beuploadcdwiththewebsiteolthc I{espondentF.ltherelbre nowthet'eis noneed lefttohear and clccidcthe stal'applicationftrr' stafingtheauctiot't ptoccssschedLrledlbr today. 9.SinceApplicantCounselheLselfpraying to withdraw this SA rvithliberly tofllcaliesh, Applicantsideispelnrittcdtowithdrau'this SAwithliberlytolrlcaficshandraisealllegal andfactualissueandquestiottinfuture rvheneveroccasiot-t arises. 10.Sof-arclilectionag.ainstthe l{cspondentttr takesettlementlcttcrisooncsrncdsucll clirection cannotbsissLred. Il.Thereforeu'ith libcrtl'givenasaborc,this SAisbeingdisposedol'aswithdra2 So |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Applicants
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court