Ms Ambika Solvex Ltd. v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/650/2023
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
x YS. Y. CTr-o5o/2o23
¶2
mulqWfr orD6-wr q-qd5{ (q. c. w Effiwr-a rw)
¶3
(ffiq sIffi - qmfiq aft vq fisrfl c-;_d)
¶4
Vg.q. =iw - 6so/202s
¶5
- 1 fud sTfunr frdsq frftts, m-qfi \E zors d sid.fd rfud s{afl, qrlr 304, vrgr ,ftcr GrqrC+e, so/41, r+-d rrn, tn yls, E-d{ (qq) anT srqt-f-{ sft d*o.lcr .rrf,
¶6
- d-dRT tiE .rrt ft-f,t "-q * qrgFnf, fr .r-rf, sq o-0-q 64q{, ffi az, $st-d sT{il-{ q.x, ust( (qs)
¶7
- t-{
¶8
- iqc-drq-.1 TS E* W q-E .r,f, Bq s-ftq 56 s{, ffi 34 vrqrn, ..dg, G'cgq)
¶9
- ft-dr afrafr fr st-fi srfl ffi, st-fi srfl ffi, srfl ffi, ffi, de-qT,fr,
¶10
- ft-dr afrafr fr st-fi srfl ffi, st-fi srfl ffi, srfl ffi, ffi, de-qT,fr, sqq-ftq zrq{, ffi frnrf, qrrq, ffiqr qu$,
¶11
drslt (u.u.)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
Respondent No. 1
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court