Disposed

Anil Pandey Son of Satya Narayan Pandey v. Central Bank of India

DRT14 Nov 2023SA/1043/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Bench issue interim protection against possession notice based on consensus. Applicants agreed to pay outstanding dues. Appeal finally disposed subject to installment deposits within four months. Bank restrained from coercive action. Dropped if fail to deposit.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed finally. Applicants to deposit Rs. 17 Lakhs plus interest in 4 installments within 4 months. Bank directed not to take coercive action pending compliance.

	ffi
SAl t4nU23	ShriYogeshSinghBaghel,Advforth Applicant ShriAdamya Bajpai,Advforthe Respondent
	l.Matteristakenupforhearingoninterim reliefaspraye{throughSA. 2.Onmatterbeing takenApplicantCounsel byinvitingattentionon orderdated19110123 passedbytheADMsubmitsthatthrough correction ordertheADMdeclaredthatinitial orderAnn.A-I0had actuallybeen^passedon 09110123howeverduetotypographicalerror dateoforder ismentioned09ll0l22. 3.Sinceitisundisputedthattheorderunder challengedhas beenpassedon 09/10/23asthe officerpassingtheorderputthedate alsoon theorder thereisnodisputeaboutthe limitation.
	4.ApplicantCounselpraysforinterim protectionbyinvitingattentiononAnn.A-4 submitsthat as perpublicnoticeitself petitionerAnilPandeyisownerofhouse propertyKhasraNo.59,WardNo.23,opposite TVSShowroom,District-Sahdol.
	5. ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthatin pursuantto orderdated09/10/23passedbythe ADMSahdolTehsildarhasissued^possession noticedated27110123lbr takingpossession on l0llll23howeveronrequestofApplicantside notice couldnot beexecutedbutthere^is apprehensionthatany day^{physicalpossession}

ffi

SAl
t4nU23

ShriYogeshSinghBaghel,Advforth
Applicant
ShriAdamya Bajpai,Advforthe Respondent

l.Matteristakenupforhearingoninterim
reliefaspraye{throughSA.
2.Onmatterbeing takenApplicantCounsel
byinvitingattentionon orderdated19110123
passedbytheADMsubmitsthatthrough
correction ordertheADMdeclaredthatinitial
orderAnn.A-I0had actuallybeen^passedon
09110123howeverduetotypographicalerror
dateoforder ismentioned09ll0l22.
3.Sinceitisundisputedthattheorderunder
challengedhas beenpassedon 09/10/23asthe
officerpassingtheorderputthedate alsoon
theorder thereisnodisputeaboutthe
limitation.

4.ApplicantCounselpraysforinterim
protectionbyinvitingattentiononAnn.A-4
submitsthat as perpublicnoticeitself
petitionerAnilPandeyisownerofhouse
propertyKhasraNo.59,WardNo.23,opposite
TVSShowroom,District-Sahdol.

5. ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthatin
pursuantto orderdated09/10/23passedbythe
ADMSahdolTehsildarhasissued^possession
noticedated27110123lbr takingpossession on
l0llll23howeveronrequestofApplicantside
notice couldnot beexecutedbutthere^is
apprehensionthatany day^{physicalpossession}

DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER ofproperty maybetakenand^praysforin protection.
6. ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthat demandnoticeeverservedtotheAppli andnoopportunityofhearinggivenby authoritybeforepassingthe order. o e
7.RespondentCounselopposestheprayer interim protectionsubmitsthat thoughaucti hasbeenfailed howeverfollowingdue Respondent-Bankhasobtainedorderun challenged. r n S r
8. RespondentCounselfurthersubmitsthat fresh noticetillyetissuedbytheexecut authoritytherefore there isnoapprehension theApplicant. oE
9.RespondentCounselfurthersubmitsthat on todayRs.l7Lacis outstandingagainst Applicant. e
10.Atthispointoftime ApplicantCoun submitsthatApplicantsare readyto^de thetotaloutstandingamount asinlbrmed theCounselfortheRespondentB including furtherinterestaccrued from dateofpassingtheordertilldepositing^I installment. I ir v e
I1.RespondentCounselisalsoagree submissionofApplicantsideto^disposed thisSAfinallysubjecttocondition depositingtotaloutstandingamountinclud futureinterestwithinfourmonthsfromtod to of of ob

DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER
ofproperty maybetakenand^praysforin
protection.

6. ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthat
demandnoticeeverservedtotheAppli
andnoopportunityofhearinggivenby
authoritybeforepassingthe order.
o
e

7.RespondentCounselopposestheprayer
interim protectionsubmitsthat thoughaucti
hasbeenfailed howeverfollowingdue
Respondent-Bankhasobtainedorderun
challenged.
r
n
S
r

8. RespondentCounselfurthersubmitsthat
fresh noticetillyetissuedbytheexecut
authoritytherefore there isnoapprehension
theApplicant.
oE

9.RespondentCounselfurthersubmitsthat
on todayRs.l7Lacis outstandingagainst
Applicant.
e

10.Atthispointoftime ApplicantCoun
submitsthatApplicantsare readyto^de
thetotaloutstandingamount asinlbrmed
theCounselfortheRespondentB
including furtherinterestaccrued from
dateofpassingtheordertilldepositing^I
installment.
I
ir
v
e

I1.RespondentCounselisalsoagree
submissionofApplicantsideto^disposed
thisSAfinallysubjecttocondition
depositingtotaloutstandingamountinclud
futureinterestwithinfourmonthsfromtod
to
of
of
ob

ffi
12.Looking toconsensusofboth thesidethi SAisbeingdisposedoffinallysubject conditionsmentionedasbelow:-
(i)TheApplicants shalldepositintheirlo accountRs.17,00,000/-(RupeesSev
Lac)plusinterestaccruedfromtodaytill depositinglastinstallmentwithth
Respondent-Bankinequalfburinstallments withinfourmonthsfromtoday.
(ii)OutofitRs.4,25,000/-(Rupeesl-'ourLac andTwentyFive^'fhousandonly)shallbe depositedwithinonemonth i.e.,tilll4ll2l23, secondinstallment Rs.4,25,000/-^(RupeesFo LacandTwentyFiveThousandonly)shallbe depositedtilll410ll24,thirdinsrallment Rs.4,25,000/-(RupeesFourLacandTwenty FiveThousandonly)shallbedepositedtill 14102124andfourth&finalinstallmentfor remainingamount Rs.4,25,000/-^(RupeesFour LacandTwenty FivcThousandonly) including futureinterest accruedsince passingtheorder tilldepositinglastinstallmentshallbe deposited on orbefore14103124.
(iiDRespondent-Bankisdirectedtofurnish information abouttofutureinterestaccrued sincepassingtheordertilldepositinglast installmentwithinl5daysfromdepositing thirdinstallment.
(iv)Subjecttodepositingtheamountas aforesaid, Respondent-Bankisdirectednotto takecoerciveactionagainstthcapplicantsin pursuanttoorderdated09/10/23passedbythe ADM,thatistosayexecutionoftheorder

ffi

12.Looking toconsensusofboth thesidethi
SAisbeingdisposedoffinallysubject
conditionsmentionedasbelow:-

(i)TheApplicants shalldepositintheirlo
accountRs.17,00,000/-(RupeesSev

Lac)plusinterestaccruedfromtodaytill
depositinglastinstallmentwithth

Respondent-Bankinequalfburinstallments
withinfourmonthsfromtoday.

(ii)OutofitRs.4,25,000/-(Rupeesl-'ourLac
andTwentyFive^'fhousandonly)shallbe
depositedwithinonemonth i.e.,tilll4ll2l23,
secondinstallment Rs.4,25,000/-^(RupeesFo
LacandTwentyFiveThousandonly)shallbe
depositedtilll410ll24,thirdinsrallment
Rs.4,25,000/-(RupeesFourLacandTwenty
FiveThousandonly)shallbedepositedtill
14102124andfourth&finalinstallmentfor
remainingamount Rs.4,25,000/-^(RupeesFour
LacandTwenty FivcThousandonly) including
futureinterest accruedsince passingtheorder
tilldepositinglastinstallmentshallbe
deposited on orbefore14103124.

(iiDRespondent-Bankisdirectedtofurnish
information abouttofutureinterestaccrued
sincepassingtheordertilldepositinglast
installmentwithinl5daysfromdepositing
thirdinstallment.

(iv)Subjecttodepositingtheamountas
aforesaid, Respondent-Bankisdirectednotto
takecoerciveactionagainstthcapplicantsin
pursuanttoorderdated09/10/23passedbythe
ADM,thatistosayexecutionoftheorder

DESGRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER
passedbytheADMSahdol,isherebys withtheeffectfromtoday.
(v)lftheapplioantsfailtodeposit installmentasmentionedabove, Respondent-Bankisfreetotakeaction theapplicantsasperorderdated09/10 passedbytheADMSahdolto remainingamount. reco v e t J er
13. Subjecttoconditions mentionedabove SAstanddisposedoffinally. s
14.Recordbeconsigned to the recordroom. (Ram Iwas Patel) Presidin offi r D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&c.c)

DESGRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER

passedbytheADMSahdol,isherebys
withtheeffectfromtoday.

(v)lftheapplioantsfailtodeposit
installmentasmentionedabove,
Respondent-Bankisfreetotakeaction
theapplicantsasperorderdated09/10
passedbytheADMSahdolto
remainingamount.
reco
v
e
t
J
er

13. Subjecttoconditions mentionedabove
SAstanddisposedoffinally.
s

14.Recordbeconsigned to the recordroom.
(Ram
Iwas Patel)
Presidin offi
r
D.R.T,Jabalpur
(M.P&c.c)

Anil Pandey Son of Satya Narayan Pandey v. Central Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Pandey Son of Satya Narayan Pandey v. Central Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vyas versus Mentor Home Loan India Ltd.

State Bank of India versus M/S Prabhu Dayal Bhaiya Lal Dixit

Rajesh Jain versus Indian Bank

Dulari Bai Agrawal versus Punjab National Bank

Ms Ambika Solvex Ltd. versus State Bank of India

Shri Anil Kumar Prasad versus Au Small Finance Bank Limited