Order by Debts Recovery Tribunal in a Non-Prosecution dismissal of Securitisation Application No.62/2023 filled by video conference due to applicant's absence, dismissing the matter for want of prosecution.
Securitisation Application No.62/2023 dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed of; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
20.11.2023
Sr. No.16 SA No.62/2023
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
|---|---|---|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.62/2023 Usha Vijay Goyal ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent None for the applicant. The matter is taken through VC. |
||
| 1. In this matter nobody is appearing for the applicant since long. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.62/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.62/2023) Page 1 of 1
Usha Vijay Goyal
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
