Disposed

Bank of Baroda v. Mr Ajaykumar Chandraprakash Baheti

DRT20 Nov 2023OA/285/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An interlocutory application in a disposed original application seeking return of documents and refund of court fees was filed. The Presiding Officer allowed the application and disposed of the remaining original application, noting that the account was closed.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory application allowed; original application disposed off; original documents returned; court fees refunded.

Bank of Baroda versus Mr Ajaykumar Chandraprakash Baheti — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶3

ORDER SHEET

¶4

	20.11. Sr. No	2023 .02	OA No. 285/2022
Classifi cation	No. of Exh.
		Bank Versu Mr. A Mr. M The m 1. 2. 3. A. B.	INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2035/2023 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 285/2022 of Baroda ..Applicant s jaykumar Chandraprakash Baheti ..Defendants .M. Jadhav h/for M.V. Kini – Advocate for the applicant. atter is taken through Video Conference. By this Interlocutory Application No.2035/2023 the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the account has been upgraded. He requests for disposal of the matter. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER The Interlocutory Application No.2035/2023 stands allowed. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Original Application No.285/2022 stands disposed off.
		C. D. E.	The original documents, if any filed be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. The court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶5

[SBJ] (OA No.285/2022) Page 1 of 1

Bank of Baroda v. Mr Ajaykumar Chandraprakash Baheti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Mr Ajaykumar Chandraprakash Baheti

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Canara Bank versus Nilesh Nivrutti Bochare

S N P Agro Private Limited versus State Bank of India

Rajesh Venkatrao Gore versus Punjab National Bank (Oriental Bank of Commerce)

Santosh Vasantlal Shetiya versus Nagar Urban Co. Operative Bank

Usha Vijay Goyal versus State Bank of India

Canara Bank versus M/S Sangeeta Industries