SA filed challenging sale notice was disposed as settled out of court after both parties admitted the loan account settlement, without costs.
SA disposed as settled without costs; interim orders vacated; other IAs closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.A.522 of 2022 29.03.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 29th day of March, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 522 of 2022
Mrs.R.Dhanalakshmi, W/o.Late R.Ramesh, Plot No.23, Flat No.S2, DAC Fantasy, Jayatheertha Rao Street, L.I.C colony, Pammal, Chennai – 600 075. ….Applicant Vs.
The Authorized Officer, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., Central and Registered Office Edelweiss House, Off CST Road, Kalina, Mumbai – 400 098. ….Respondent
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s.G.Sanjeevi. Counsel for Respondent : M/s.V.Balasubramani.
ORDER
and hence prayed for permission to withdraw the SA. Ld. counsel for applicant made
2
S.A.522 of 2022 29.03.2023
an endorsement to that effect in SA paper book. Representative counsel for respondent institution also admitted that loan account is settled out of Court.
Sd/-
(GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
Mrs. R. Dhanalakshmi
The Authorized Officer, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
