Disposed
Nitin Bansal v. L and T Finance Limited
DRTSA/474/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
GASE No
¶4
| DATE | OESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA474122 11104123 |
ShriShubham NanePag,Advforthe Applicant ShriMallikarjun Khare,Adv lorthc RespondentNo.l OnmatterbeingtakenApplicantCounsel praysforwithdrawalofthis mattersubmitting thataccountoftheApplicantshasalreadl been settled. RespondentCounsel hasalsoagreed pointthatmatterhas beensettledand sLrbmitsthatnoduescertificatehas bcenissued. Onperusalofdocttmentfiledalongwith applicationforurgent hearingbythc RespondentsideatPage-2itrevealthatno duescertificatehasalreadybeenissued. Lookingtofact thatmatterhasalreadybecrt scttled,oralprayertbrwithdrawalofthe ApplicantCounsel is allowed. Applicantsarepermitted to wilhdrarv thisSA Matteris beingdisposedofaswithdrawn. Recordbeconsignedtothe record rom. (RamNiwasPatel) Presidin Officer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) onthc lu rth cr' already |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shri Shubham Nane Pag
- respondent
Shri Mallikarjun Khare
Coram
AI extract
RamNiwasPatel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court