The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of Securitization Application No.410/2022 upon the applicant's representation that the matter was settled with the respondent bank via a one-time settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 07. Sr. |
09.202 No.52 |
3 SA No.410/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.410/2022 | ||
| Khalil Yakub Shaikh ..Applicant Versus Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. P. T. Dhage - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. B. Choudhari – Advocate for the defendant-bank. 1. In this matter the reply has already been filed. 2. In this matter the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has been settled with the respondent-bank and he is arranging for making payments under one time settlement to the respondent-bank. 3. In these circumstances, this Securitisation Application shall be disposed off because he will be making all endeavour to make payment as per the settlement to the respondent-bank. |
||
| 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.410/2022 stands disposed off. B. Accordingly, all interlocutory applications stand disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.410/2022) Page 1 of 1
Khalil Yakub Shaikh
Osmanabad Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
