In a securitisation application filed before the DRT, Aurangabad, the applicant did not appear on the hearing date. The tribunal discharged the proceedings for non-prosecution and dismissed the application along with any pending IA.
Securitisation Application No.23/2023 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution; all pending IAs disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 17 Sr |
.04.20 . No.10 |
23 SA No.23/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.23/2023 | ||
| Mrs. Chhaya Shashikant Dhalkari ..Applicant Versus Canara Bank ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. P.N. Kapadia - Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken up through VC. |
||
| 1. None appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested. 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.23/2023 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.23/2023) Page 1 of 1
Mrs. Chhaya Shashikant Dhalkari
Canara Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
