Dismissed

Manda Dhondiba Barve v. Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited

DRT8 Nov 2023SA/403/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for securitisation, upon hearing the respondent's counsel who submitted that the matter was settled, the entire amount received, and the account closed, the Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application and disposed of all interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Securitisation Application No. 403/2022 is dismissed; all interlocutory applications are disposed off.

Manda Dhondiba Barve versus Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited — DRT (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

¶2

08 Sr	.11.202 . No.88	3 SA No.403/2022
Classifica tion	No. of Exh.
		SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.403/2022
		Manda Dhondiba Barve ..Applicant Versus Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited ..Respondent Mr. Parikshit Dawalkar – Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed.He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the respondent, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Securitisation Application No.403/2022 stands dismissed. B. Accordingly all Interlocutory Applications stands disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶3

[SBJ]

¶4

(SA No.403/2022) Page 1 of 1

Manda Dhondiba Barve v. Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manda Dhondiba Barve v. Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs Nilofar Raheman Shaikh versus Icici Home Finance Company Limited

Bhumi Enterprises versus Godavari Laxmi Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Manoj Narayan Adhane versus Adarsh Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Vinaykumar Rikhabchand Kothari versus The Malkapur Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.

Bank of Baroda versus Ravindra Dattatraya Dahiwal

Union Bank of India versus Gaurav