Security application dismissed due to non-prosecution when applicant failed to appear.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IAs disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 08 Sr |
.11.202 . No.91 |
3 SA No.275/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifica tion |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.275/2022 | ||
| Vinaykumar Rikhabchand Kothari ..Applicant Versus The Malkapur Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. In this matter none appears for applicant. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. Even after the passed over none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.275/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.275/2022) Page 1 of 1
Vinaykumar Rikhabchand Kothari
The Malkapur Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
