Appeal challenging recovery measures initiated under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant. Interim orders vacated and other pending IAs closed without costs.
SA dismissed as withdrawn without costs; interim orders vacated; other pending IAs closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.A.377 of 2023 20.10.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 20th day of October, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
SARFAESI APPLICATION No. 377 of 2023
Mrs. A. Padma Manohar, No. 30/60, 3rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. ….Applicant
-Vs-
The Authorized Officer, M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., Dare House, 2, N.S.C. Bose Road,
Parrys, Chennai – 600 001. ….Respondent
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. RKM Suresh Counsel for respondent institution : M/s Kishore Balasubramanian
ORDER
2
S.A.377 of 2023 20.10.2023
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and pronounced by me in Open Court, on this the
20th day of October, 2023)
Sd/-
(GANAPATHI K.R.K)
PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special application challenging recovery measures under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act should be allowed to continue or if it be dismissed as withdrawn.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. A. Padma Manohar
The Authorized Officer, M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
