On expired applicant's behalf, counsel reported settlement of dues. Directory disposed of Securitization Application No.377 of 2022 by dismissing it with no order as to costs.,
Securitization Application No.377 of 2022 was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
06.10.2023
Sr. No.16
| SA No.377 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Inderraj Beharilal Kapoor Vs. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. & Ors. |
| Mr Raj Dani i/b M/s. Thodur Law Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Mr Dani, representing the applicant, submits that the applicant has expired and there are no legal heirs. Be that as it may, the matter has been settled and the dues have been paid. The learned counsel requests the Tribunal to dispose of the Securitization Application. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, Securitization Application No.377 of 2022 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Mr Inderraj Beharilal Kapoor
Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd & Ors.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
