Application No.11 of 2022 for declarations and/or setting aside orders was dismissed simpliciter and for want of prosecution due to lack of representation by the applicants.
Securitisation Application No.11 of 2022 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
06.10.2023 Sr. No.47
SA No.11 of 2022
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
M/s. Vijayalakashmi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. On 18thAugust 2023, no representation was made by the applicants and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicants either personally or through the |
||
| advocate. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.11 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. 2. All pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
M/s. Vijayalakashmi Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
