The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a securitisation application due to the applicant's non-appearance, invoking non-appearance provisions, and dismissed pending interlocutory applications.
Securitisation application No.377/2022 dismissed for non-appearance; all pending Interlocutory Applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 13. Sr. |
07.20 No.7 |
23 4 SA No.377/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.377/2022 Anjali Bodhak ..Applicant Versus Balasaheb Madhukar Khomne & others ..Respondents None for the applicant. Mr. R.S.Gangakhedkar – Advocate for the respondent no2. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In view of my order dated 22ndSeptember, 2022 certain clarifications were sought. Thereafter dates were taken one after one. |
||
| 2. Time and again the matter has again re-notified. In view of the orders dated 22ndSeptember, 2022 and non- appearance of the applicants, Securitisation Application stands dismissed. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.377/2022 stands dismissed for nonappearance. |
||
| B. Accordingly, all pending Interlocutory Applications stands disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.377/2022) Page 1 of 1
Anjali Bodhak
Balasaheb Madhukar Khomne & others
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
