Securitisation Application dismissed for non-prosecution as applicant absent on dates of hearing and expressed lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
The Securitisation Application No.14/2022 stood dismissed for non-prosecution and pending IAs disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
13.07.2023
Sr. No.48 SA No.14/2022
SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.14/2022
Savita Sanjay Dhakane ..Applicant
Versus
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance
Company Ltd. ..Respondent
None for the applicant.
None for the respondents.
The matter is taken up through VC.
1. None appears for the parties. The applicant as well as the
respondent was also not present on last date of hearing i.e.
06 th June, 2023 and as such in the interest of justice the
matter was re-notified.
2. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that
the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through
video conferencing:
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No.14/2022 stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of
accordingly.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifica tion No. of Exh.
[SBJ]
(SA No.14/2022) Page 1 of 1
Savita Sanjay Dhakane
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
