This order dismisses an application for restoration of a diary entry due to the applicant's complete non-prosecution after being passed over multiple times, treating the default as an indication of lack of interest.
The miscellaneous application was dismissed for non-prosecution and the file consigned to the Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL,AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 1 S |
7.07.20 r. No.0 |
23 7 M.A No.42/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.42/2023 Sharada Narayan Barde ..Applicant Versus HDFC Bank ..Respondent None for the applicant. 1. None appears for the applicant. 2. This is Miscellaneous Application No.42/2023 for restoration of Diary (Securitisation Application) No.1243/2022 which was dismissed in default on 13th March, 2023. 3. Today also none appears for the applicants. Even after passed over nobody appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order: ORDER A. The Miscellaneous Application No.42/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the Record Room |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (MA No. 42/2023) Page 1 of 1
Sharada Narayan Barde
HDFC Bank
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
