Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitisation Application No.312/2022 for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear and the respondent did not file a reply due to lack of paper book.
Securitisation Application No.312/2022 dismissed for non-prosecution; interlocutory applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CAMP AT NANDED)
ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
0.09.2 r. No. |
023 06 SA No.312/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.312/2022 | ||
| Ganesh Balasaheb Agale ..Applicant Versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. B. R. Kedar – Advocate for the respondent-FI 1. In this matter none present for the applicant. Even after passed over nobody appears for the applicant. 2. In this matter the counsel for the respondent appears and submits that till date paper book is not supplied. In these circumstances it is not possible for them to file the reply. 3. In these circumstances, it appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order: ORDER A. Securitisation Application No.312/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. Accordingly, all interlocutory applications stands disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. Orders may be downloaded from the web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.312/2022) Page 1 of 1
Ganesh Balasaheb Agale
Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
