In order 468/2022, the arbitrator dismissed the Securitization Application for non-prosecution after noting the absence of both parties for hearings scheduled on 28.04.2023 and on the date of passing the order.
Securitisation Application and all Interlocutory Applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 20. Sr. |
09.202 No.23 |
3 SA No.468/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.468/2022 Keshrnath Dashrath Karlae ..Applicant Versus |
||
| Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited ..Respondent |
||
| None for the Applicant. None for respondent FI The matter is taken through Video Conference/hybrid. 1. The respondent FI has not filed reply. It is noted by the Registrar that the applicant as well as respondent absent on 28thApril, 2023. The applicant is not now sincere to pursue the matter. |
||
| 2. Today also none present for the applicant as well as the respondent. In the interest of justice the matter was re-notified. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.468/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the Interlocutory Applications stand disposed off. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.468/2022) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Keshrnath Dashrath Karlae
Mahindra Rural Housing Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
