Dismissed
Sandip Panjabrao Wagh v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/287/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶2
ORDER SHEET
¶3
12.09.2023
¶4
| S | r. No. | 53 SA No.287/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.287/2022 | ||
| Sandip Panjabrao Wagh ..Applicants Versus State Bank of India ..Respondents |
||
| None for the applicants. Mr. Ravi Gite h/for Mr. Arun Rakh – Advocate for the respondent bank |
||
| The matter is taken through VC/hybrid. 1. None present for the applicant. Metter was Passover, even after pass over none present for the applicant. |
||
| 2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the property already sold in the year 2020. |
||
| 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through Video Conference: ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.287/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Consign the file to the record Room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶5
[APK] (SA No.287/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Sandip Panjabrao Wagh
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court