Dismissed
Neeta Vitthal Pampatwar v. Union Bank of India
DRTSA/269/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CAMP AT NANDED)
ORDER SHEET
11.09.2023
Sr. No.10 SA No.269/2023
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
|---|---|---|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.269/2023 | ||
| Neeta Vitthal Pampatwar ..Applicant Versus Union Bank of India ..Respondent |
||
| Mr. V.R. Patil - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.A. Mishra – Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed.He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the respondent-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Securitisation Application No.269/2023 stands dismissed. B. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.269/2023) Page 1 of 1
Neeta Vitthal Pampatwar
Union Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court