Disposed
Aruna Wdo Mahendra Kala v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/284/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
10.10.2023
¶5
| S | r. No. | 06 SA No.284/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.284/2023 Aruna Mahendra Kala ..Applicant Versus Indian Bank ..Respondent Mr. U.N.Shete - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Prashant Nikam – Advocate for the respondent bank The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed. The learned counsel for the respondent requests to dispose of the matter. 2. The learned counsel for the respondent bank has uploaded the compromise documents on the official web-site which are taken on record. |
||
| 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the respondent-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER |
||
| A. Securitisation Application No.284/2023 is disposed of as settled. |
||
| B. All the pending Interlocutory Applications if any are disposed of accordingly. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site**.** |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Aruna Mahendra Kala
- respondent
Indian Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court