Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of Original Application No. 314/2022 and Interlocutory Application No. 1052/2023 as settled on representation that the account was closed and proceeds received.
Disposal of Applications 1052/2023 and 314/2022 as settled; return of documents and refund of court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 11 Sr. |
.10.202 No.02 |
3 OA No. 86/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classificat ion |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 86/2022 State Bank of India ..Applicant Versus Prem Industries Avasarmal ..Defendants Mr. Arun Rakh- Advocate for the applicant. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed. He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Interlocutory Application no.1052/2023 & Original Application No.314/2022 is disposed of as settled. B. The original title documents, if any filed be returned as per rules. C. Court fees be refunded as per rules and as per the orders passed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. D. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
