The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Section 14 application as infructuous as the underlying account had been upgraded and no interest loss. The applicant did not appear. Pending interim orders were vacated.
Allowing the contention that the application has become infructuous, the application was dismissed with all pending stays vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date of .er or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
|---|---|---|
| SA 255 of2022 | ||
| 12.04.2023 | Ld. counsel for the respondent submits that reply has already been filed in this case against the SA. But the account in question has been upgraded. Hence the present S. application has become infructuous. None W'appeared on behalf of the applicant.Itappears that the account of the up gradation of the loan account and the applicant has lost interest. Accordingly the present S application is dismissed as infructuous along with all pending lAs if any. Interim order if any stands vacated. |
|
| Patna (Kaushru~YadaV Presiding Officer Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. |
' |
Applicant
Respondent
Kaushru YadaV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
