Disposed

Shri Aditya Kumar v. Idbi Bank

DRT10 Jan 2023SA/240/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an application for change of counsel and, given that the applicants deposited the settlement amount and obtained oral consent from the Respondent-Bank for withdrawal upon issuance of title deed and NOC, permitted the withdrawal of the Specific Application and disposed of the matter as settled.

What did the court decide?

Allowed change of counsel (IA 10/2023) and withdrawal of Specific Application (IA 80/2023). Respondent-Bank directed to issue NOC and title deed.

Shri Aditya Kumar versus Idbi Bank — Property and Title | DRT (2023)

i:.

lti' CONTD, ORD EET

PAGE No

CASE ]lo

i.,

DATE	DESCRIPTEilOFTHEORDER
sA240t2 t0/0U23	Shri UtkarshAgrawal,AdvfortheApplicants ShriAnil^,Tiwari,Adv fortheRespondent No.l :r Noneforothers
	l.ApplicantCounselShriAgrawal,has invitedattentiononIANo.l0/2023dated 02101123submitsthat earlierhehasfiledthis interimapplicationforchangeofcounsel sinceearliercounselhasnotgiven NOC. l 2.Atthetimeofhearingtothisapplication earliercounselShri Upadhayisalsobeforethe Benchonbeingaskedhesubmitsthat hehas noobjection..
	3.Therefore IANo.10/2023dated 02101123is herebyallowed.
	4.ShriAgrpwal,ispermitted toactonbehalf oftheApplicahts.
	5.ApplicantCounselfurtherinvited attentiononiIAN0,80/2023dated09101123 submitsthpta9per imicablesettlementthe Respondent-Bank hhs^'issuedsanctionletter Ann.D-lahdthelApplicants havedeposited thesettlementamounton24112122asper Ann.D-2. ,1
	6.Applicant,Counsel furthersubmitsthatas per oralinstructionoftheRespondent-Bank titledeedandNOCshallbeissuedafter withdrawingthis SAthereforenowthe Applicantsaredbsirestowith wthisSA

¶8

REMARK

r r ll

CONTD. ORDE

HEET

PAGE No

..t ,;

GASE No

DATE	DrE IPT ONo^F H T o E D R R E	REMARK
	unconditionalandbeingfiledapplicationfor thesame. Ii
	il 7.Coun5elrforytheRespondentShri Tiwari, is alsoconsentedabout the prayerasadvanced by theApplicdrrtCounsel.
	8.Since matterhasalreadybeensettled amicablyIANo.80/2023dated09107123is herebyallowed.
	9. SA. Appli i^{cantsarepermittedto withdrawthis}
	10. Respondent;Bankisdirectedtoissue NOCan[tor0turn thetitledeedasperrule. Li ,L Il.Thi\lmatte'i'isbeingdisposedofas withdrawh.^',' ':r 12.Recordbeconsignedtotherecordroom. (RamNiw Patel) Fresidin Officer D.R.T,Jabalpur ' (M.P&C.G) ;

Shri Aditya Kumar v. Idbi Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Aditya Kumar v. Idbi Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uco Bank versus M/S Aditi Lime Stone

Rajendra Kulkarni versus L.I.C. Housing Finance

Hdfc Bank versus Yash Electronics

Smt Santosh Bai versus Idbi Bank

Ms Draft Wood Hotels Pvt. Ltd. versus Union Bank of India

Bank of India versus Tanveer Warsi