Dismissed

Avinash Sajjanrao Kadam v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited

DRT17 Apr 2023SA/100/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order passed by the DRT in Aurangabad dismissed the securitisation application in default due to the applicant's failure to appear over three consecutive dates, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.

What did the court decide?

Securitisation Application No.100/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. Pending IAs disposed of accordingly.

Avinash Sajjanrao Kadam versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation… — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

¶2

	17.04 Sr. N	.2023 o.35 SA No.100/2022
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.100/2022
		Avinash Sajjanrao Kadam ..Applicant Versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. Balbhim Kedar – Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. None appears for the applicant. It is reported that the applicants are not appearing since last three dated. It appears that the applicants are not interested. 2. Today also none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER
		A. The Securitisation Application No.100/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room.
		(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶3

[SBJ]

¶4

(SA No.100/2022) Page 1 of 1

Avinash Sajjanrao Kadam v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash Sajjanrao Kadam v. Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Apex Urban Co. Operative Bank of Maharashtra and Goa Limited versus Mumbai Zilla Madhyavarti Sah. Bank Maryadit

State Bank of India versus M/S Adarsh Agri Clinic Agri

Hanif Hayatsab Shaikh versus Bank of Baroda

Mrs Chhaya Shashikant Dhalkari versus Canara Bank

Raman Dharmpal Kapoor versus State Bank of India

Sfpl Crop Life Science Private Limited versus Union Bank of India