Disposed
Mrs Surbhi Janak Katakia v. Tata Capital Financial Service Limited
DRTSA/228/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
13.01.2023
Sr. No.4
| SA No.228 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mrs. Surbhi Janak Katakia & Ors. Vs. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. & Ors. |
| Mr Jamshed Ansari – Advocate for the applicants. Mr R.L. Motwani – Advocate for defendants. |
||
| 1. The learned counsel for the parties submits that the Securitization Application has become infructuous as the mortgaged property has been sold and physical possession has been handed over to the auction purchaser. Sale certificate is also handed to the auction purchaser. Nothing survives. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, Securitization Application No.228 of 2022 stands disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs. 2. All pending I.A’s stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court