The Tribunal, upon the applicant's submission that the defendant repaid the entire dues during the pendency of the Original Application, permitted the withdrawal of OA No.9 of 2023 by allowing the Interlocutory Application.
Permission granted to withdraw Original Application No.9 of 2023. Application dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.6
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2933 of 2022
In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.9 of 2023
Canara Bank
… Applicant
Versus
Mr Ummed Singh Rathore … Defendant
Ms Saraswati Rajpurohit i/b M/s. Rajkumar K. Shukla Law Firm – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 13th January 2023.
ORDER
as to costs.
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
13.01.2023
Sr. No.6
| OA No.9 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Canara Bank Vs. Mr. Ummed Singh Rathore |
| Ms Saraswati Rajpurohit i/b M/s. Rajkumar K. Shukla Law Firm – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.2933 of 2022 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2933 of 2022, Original Application No.9 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees and (ii) return the original title deeds and documents as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
Canara Bank
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
