Disposed
Mr Ravindra Gambhirrao Sapkal v. Asrec India Limited
DRTSA/9/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 14.09.2023 | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No. 9 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Ms. Sonal Sanap proxy counsel for M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. for the Applicant. Advocate Mr. D.B. Sawangikar proxy counsel for Advocate Ms. Vaishali Bhilare for the Respondent No.1. Other Respondents absent. Proxy counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant does not wish to pursue this S.A. as the parties have amicably settled the matter. In view of the submissions made by the proxy counsel for the Applicant, I.A. No.1928 of 2023 is allowed and Securitisation Application No.9 of 2023 stands disposed of as withdrawn with no order as to cost. File be consigned to the Record Room. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-II |
clsoed |
M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court