The applicant filed an application to withdraw a Securitisation Application No.200 of 2022. The Respondent Bank had no objection. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the Securitisation Application as withdrawn.
I.A. No.1966 of 2023 allowed; S.A. No.200 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn; pending I.As disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 13.09.2023 Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No. 200 of 2022 |
Next date |
|---|---|
| Advocate Ms. Somya Tripathi proxy counsel for M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co. for the Applicants. Advocate Ms. Shradha Agrawal proxy counsel for M/s. Rajesh Law Asso. for the Respondent No.1 Bank. Respondent No.2 absent. Application bearing I.A. No.1966 of 2023, for withdrawal of the S.A., filed by the proxy counsel for the Applicants, stating that the account is settled between the parties and the Applicants wish to withdraw the S.A. Proxy counsel for the Respondent No.1 Bank has no objection for withdrawal of the S.A. So, I.A. No.1966 of 2023 is hereby allowed and accordingly, Securitisation Application No.200 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. All pending I.As stands disposed of accordingly. File be consigned to the Record Room. Sd/- I/c P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co.
Rajesh Law Asso. / Respondent No.1 Bank
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
