Rohit S O Digambar Pawar v. Aavas Financiers Limited
DRTSA/202/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The applicant sought permission to withdraw his Securitisation Application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal and disposed of all pending applications in the proceeding.
What did the court decide?
Securitisation Application No.202/2023 disposed of as withdrawn. All pending IA disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 15. Sr. |
09.20 No.0 |
23 5 SA No.202/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.202/2023 | ||
| Rohit s/o Digambar Pawar ..Applicant Versus Aavas Financeiers Ltd. ..Respondents Mr. R.D. Sakhare - Advocate for the applicant. Sweetha Iyengar - Advocate for the respondents. The matter is taken through Video Conference. |
||
| 1. In this matter the counsel for the applicant seeks | ||
| permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the |
||
| Securitisation Application. | ||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.202/2023 stands disposed off as withdrawn. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[SBJ]
¶4
(SA No.202/2023) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rohit s/o Digambar Pawar
- respondent
Aavas Financeiers Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court