Disposed
Jogeshwari Pharma v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/61/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 15 Sr |
.09.202 . No.87 |
3 SA No.61/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifica tion |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.61/2022 | ||
| Jogeshwari Pharma ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondent Mr. D.B. Thoke – Advocate for the applicant. Mr. D.R. Jethliya – Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant told that the matter may be disposed off as infructuous. |
||
| 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.61/2022 stands disposed off as infructuous. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the pending interlocutory applications stand disposed off. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[SBJ]
¶4
(SA No.61/2022) Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Jogeshwari Pharma
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court