Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad dismissed a Securitisation Application due to non-prosecution as the applicant was absent and showed no interest in pursuing the matter.
Securitisation Application No.187/2022 dismissed for non-prosecution; all interlocutory applications disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 20. Sr. |
09.20 No.8 |
23 8 SA No.187/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.187/2022 | ||
| Sharmila Bherumal Mewani ..Applicant Versus State Bank of India ..Respondents None for the applicant. None for the respondents. The matter is taken through VC. 1. In this matter nobody is appearing for the applicant and the respondent bank. 2. Earlier occasion also nobody is appearing for the applicants. |
||
| 3. Today none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter. 1. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.187/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. Accordingly all the Interlocutory Applications stand disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.187/2022) Page 1 of 1
Sharmila Bherumal Mewani
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
