The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitization Application No.187 of 2022 for want of prosecution, as no representation was made by the applicants despite listing for dismissal.
Application stood dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
16.06.2023
Sr. No.48
| classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
SA No.187 of 2022 Mr. Jigar Shailesh Shah & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda |
|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | ||
1. On 9thJune 2023, no representation was made by the applicants and therefore, it is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicants either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitization Application No.187 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- | ||
| Manali | Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Mr. Jigar Shailesh Shah & Ors.
Manali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
