Dismissed
Sushant Kumar Ambasta v. Bank of Maharashtra
DRTAPPEAL/5/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
16.06.2023
¶5
Sr. No.52
¶6
| Appeal No.5 of 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr Sushant Bank of Mah |
Kumar Ambasta Vs. arashtra & Ors. |
| None for the appellant. Ms Mamta Varma i/b Mr respondent no.1. None for other respondents. |
Sachin Koli – Advocate for | ||
| 1. Sufficient opportunity advocate on record to w no representation is personally or through appellant is not interes further. Hence, Appeal for want of prosecution |
was granted to the appellant’s ithdraw the Appeal. Even today, made by the appellant either the advocate. It appears the ted in prosecuting the case any No.5 of 2023 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶7
Nidhi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mr Sushant Kumar Ambasta & Ors.
- respondent
Bank of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
Hon'ble Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court