Govind Champalal Navandar v. Sunderlal Sawaji Urban Co-Op Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The application was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the applicant did not appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 15 Sr |
.09.202 . No.57 |
3 SA No.181/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifica tion |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.181/2022 | ||
| Govind Champalal Navandar ..Applicant Versus Sunderlal Sawaji Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd. ..Respondent None for the applicant. None for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. None appears for the applicant earlier also on 20thJune, 2023. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears for the applicant. Even after passed over, none appears for the applicants. It appears that the applicants are not interested in pursuing this matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. |
||
| ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.181/2022 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. All the pending interlocutory applications stands disposed off accordingly. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.181/2022) Page 1 of 1
Govind Champalal Navandar
Sunderlal Sawaji Urban Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court