The applicant requested dismissal of their Securitisation Application due to lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. The Tribunal dismissed the application for non-prosecution.
Securitisation Application No.178/2023 stood dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CAMP AT NANDED)
ORDER SHEET
12.06.2023
Sr. No.20 SA No.178/2023
SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No.178/2023
Pankaj S/o Kiranlal Zalani ..Applicant
Versus
State Bank of India ..Respondent
None appears for the applicant.
None for the Respondents.
The matter is taken through VC.
1. In this matter none appears for the applicant.
2. Even after passed over none appears for the applicants.
It appears that the applicants are not interested in
prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through
video conferencing.
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No.178/2023 stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of
accordingly.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Vimal Gupta)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
[SBJ] (SA No.178/2023) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pankaj S/o Kiranlal Zalani
State Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
