The Debut Recovery Tribunal disposed of Original Application No. 08/2022 filed by Bank of Baroda against Dipak Vevakanand Chakranarayan as withdrawn after the amount was received and account closed.
The Original Application No.08/2022 disposed of as withdrawn; original documents returned to the bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 09.06. Sr. No |
2023 .06 OA No. 08/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 08/2022 | ||
| Bank of Baroda ..Applicant Versus Dipak Vevakanand Chakranarayan ..Defendant Mr.A.S.Pathak – Advocate for the applicant-bank. None for the defendant. The matter is taken through hybrid. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant requests for return of the original documents and also seeks to withdraw the Original Application. 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Original Application No.08/2022 stands disposed of as withdrawn. B. The original document be returned to the Authorised Officer of the applicant bank as per rules. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK] (OA No.08/2022) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Dipak Vevakanand Chakranarayan
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
