The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a securitisation application alongside pending interim applications. The tribunal observed that the applicant failed to appear despite multiple notices and did not prosecute the matter.
Securitisation Application No.13/2023 was dismissed and all pending interim applications were disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 13. Sr. |
07.20 No.49 |
23 SA No.13/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.13/2023 | ||
| Sonawane Poultry Feed Mill ..Applicant Versus Bank of Baroda ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Vakil – Advocate for the respondent-bank. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. None appears for the applicant. The applicant was also not present on last date of hearing i.e.29thMarch, 2023 and again on 06thJune, 2023and as such in the interest of justice the matter was re-notified. 2. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing: ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.13/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. | ||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.13/2023) Page 1 of 1
Sonawane Poultry Feed Mill
Bank of Baroda
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
