Securitisation Application No. 139 of 2022 dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of applicant and lack of representation.
Securitisation Application No.139 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
10.11.2023
Sr. No.24
| SA No.139 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
M/s. Reemr Engineering Works Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. |
| None for the parties. | ||
| 1. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that defendant and the applicant has failed to appear before the learned Registrar despite the service of notice and therefore, the matter is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.139 of 2022 stands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- | ||
| Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
M/s. Reemr Engineering Works
Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
