Icici Bank Limited versus Nitesh Eknath Ghuge — DRT (2023) — LawSathi Research

Icici Bank Limited versus Nitesh Eknath Ghuge — DRT (2023) — LawSathi Research

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

Sr. No.23

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2396 of 2023

In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.470 of 2023

ICICI Bank Ltd.

… Applicant

Versus

Mr Nitesh Eknath Ghuge & Anr. … Defendants

Mr Chandresh Rao i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants.

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 9^th November 2023.

ORDER

The parties have amicably settled the matter for an amount in the sum of Rs.4.50 lakhs. The applicant states that it has not debited the court fees from the borrower’s account and therefore, requests for the refund of the court fees. The learned counsel seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.2396 of 2023 is allowed with no order as to costs.

Sd/-

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

Nidhi

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

09.11.2023

Sr. No.23

		OA No.470 of 2023
classifi -cation	No. of Exh.	ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr Nitesh Eknath Ghuge & Anr.
		Mr Chandresh Rao i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants.
		1. Order in I.A. No.2396 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2396 of 2023, Original Application No.470 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees as per Rules and (ii) return the original documents as per Rules.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

Nidhi