In an SA appeal under the SARFAESI Act, the Tribunal dismissed the applicant's application in default as he failed to appear before the Tribunal despite multiple calls.
The application filed by the applicant was dismissed in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/106/2022 KAILASH KUMAR Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
12.10.2023 Item No.56
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Aseem Kataria, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Kataria, has made a statement at the Bar that the bank has already withdrawn the notice under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, on 18.02.2020.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
KAILASH KUMAR
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
