Disposed

Icici Bank Limited v. Pritam Manik Patil

DRT10 Jul 2023OA/504/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This tribunal disposed of the Original Application in banking recovery proceedings after granting permission to the applicant bank to withdraw the matter. The withdrawal was based on the settlement and payment of the entire debt between the parties.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory Application allowed; original application disposed of as settled; permission sought for return of documents and refund of court fees.

Icici Bank Limited versus Pritam Manik Patil — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶3

ORDER SHEET

¶4

	10.07. Sr. No	2023 .10 OA No. 504/2022
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.606/2023 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 504/2022 ICICI Bank Limited ..Applicant Versus Pritam Manik Patil ..Defendants Mr. K.D. Pande - Advocate for the applicant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. By this interlocutory application the applicant bank seeks permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the Original Application. The applicant submits that the matter is amicably settled / compromised between the parties and the entire amount of settlement has been paid as full and final and account is closed. 2. The applicant therefore, seeks permission of this Tribunal to withdraw the Original Application. The applicant also seeks return of original documents and refund of the court fees. 3. The applicant has made out the case for withdrawal of the original application, return of original documents and refund of the court fees. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through Video Conference: ORDER A. Interlocutory Application No.606/2023 is allowed. Original Application No.504/2022 stands disposed of as settled.

¶5

[SBJ] (OA No.504/2022) Page 1 of 2

¶6

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)

¶7

ORDER SHEET

¶8

B. The original title documents, if any filed be returned by keeping certified copies on record as per rules.

¶9

A. Consign the file to the record Room.

¶10

(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

¶11

[SBJ] (OA No.504/2022) Page 2 of 2

Icici Bank Limited v. Pritam Manik Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Icici Bank Limited v. Pritam Manik Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State Bank of India versus New Super Traders

Idbi Bank versus Sham Arjun Karale

State Bank of India versus Shalivahan Farms Pvt. Ltd.

State Bank of India versus Ganesh Jaising Rathod

Pandurang Kondiram Solunke versus The District Collector Beed

State Bank of India versus Sara Properties