Dismissed

Pandurang Kondiram Solunke v. The District Collector Beed

DRT10 Jul 2023MA/36/2023

Case brief

AI extract

Application for restoration of a default-dismissed matter dismissed due to non-appearance of the new counsel. No substantive issues were addressed.

The Miscellaneous Application No.36/2023 stands dismissed.

Pandurang Kondiram Solunke versus The District… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | DRT (2023)

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET

	10.07 Sr. N	.2023 o.62 MA No.36/2023
Classific ation	No. of Exh.
		MISC. APPLICATION No.36/2023 Pandurang Kondiram Solunke ..Applicant/s Versus The District Collector Beed ..Respondent/s None for the applicants The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the application has been filed for restoration of Miscellaneous Application No.24/2018 dismissed in default on 27^thApril, 2023. 2. Nobody is present. The proceeding is going on hybrid hearing. The advocates and the parties have choices to appear physically or through a virtual mode which may facilitate them. 3. The pleadings taken in the MA are that the MA was dismissed on 27^thApril, 2023. They had engaged a counsel for taking care of the matter but the said advocate has not given any feedback about the matter. There is nothing on record that he preferred any complaint against the said advocate. The advocate now engaged by him does not appear either through VC or physically, this MA stands dismissed. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Miscellaneous Application No.,36/2023 stands dismissed. B. File be consigned to the record room.
		(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad

[SBJ] ( MA No.36/2023) Page 1 of 1