The tribunal allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of the original application due to an out-of-court settlement of Rs.22 lakhs, subsequently dismissing the original application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the original application. Original Application No.101 of 2022 dismissed as withdrawn. Court fees to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.21
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2404 of 2023 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.101 of 2022
ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant
Versus
Mr Yogesh V. Kachole & Ors. … Defendants
Ms Purvi S.N. Divecha i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,th November 2023.
ORDER
Sd/(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
09.11.2023 Sr. No.21
| OA No.101 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr Yogesh V. Kachole & Ors. |
| Ms Purvi S.N. Divecha i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.2404 of 2023 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2404 of 2023, Original Application No.101 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees as per Rules and (ii) return the original documents as per Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
