Dismissed

Hdfc Bank v. Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr.

DRT11 Apr 2023OA/396/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Kolkata, disposed of an original application and a pending interim application as dismissed in view of a settlement reached between the applicant bank and the respondents, with the recovery of dues of Rs. 27,93,101.-

What did the court decide?

The original application and interim application were disposed of as dismissed/withdrawn/settled. Court fee refund directed to be sought from Registrar.

Hdfc Bank versus Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr. — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2023)

¶1

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶2

Page No.-	Order Sheet( continuation)
Case NO. OA IA/554/2023	/396/2022 HDFC BANK LIMITED Vs. ANIL KUMAR GUPTA & MO GUPTA	NORMA
Date of the order	Order with signature	Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary
11/04/202 3	Ld. Advocates, Ms. Mekhala Kanji & Ms. Gitasree Chattopadhyay appear for the Applicant Bank and pressing the withdrawal petition, bearing application no. IA/554/2023. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an Recovery application for recovery of a sum of Rs.38,94,516.13/- including interest and other reliefs. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received Rs. 27,93,101/- towards full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by Mr. Arnab Gangopadhyay, the Authorize Representative of the Bank and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant Bank also prays for refund of application fee. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the OA defendants if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant OA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. The Applicant Bank is entitled for refund of Court Fee in terms of the Rules for which the applicant may move before the Registrar of this Tribunal who may take decision in accordance with rules and regulations of the subject. IA/553/2023 is moved which is a put up application. Since the record is put up, the IA/553/2023 is disposed of. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer

¶3

¶4

DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA

¶5

Hdfc Bank v. Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hdfc Bank v. Anil Kumar Gupta and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hdfc Bank versus Aman Jaiswal

Bank of India versus M/S Hexagen Aqua Pvt. Ltd.

Dev Roadlines Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. versus State Bank of India

Union Bank of India versus Mr Subodh Kumar Rao and Anr.

Hdfc Bank versus Dolly Sarkar

Hdfc Bank versus Sekh Imran